Home > Anarchy > Two Laws

Two Laws

It is sometimes said that there is ‘one law for the rich and one law for the poor’.

Whilst it is true that there are Two Laws, the whole truth is that we have ‘one law for The State and one law for the people’.  And yes, generally it is those who are on the payroll of The State who are rich, and those who do real work and have to support them who are poor, but it is important to understand the situation precisely.

For The State it is okay to steal other people’s property using overwhelming force whenever necessary.

The only right of the people is the right to respect the authority of the people who parasitically live off them.  The people have no right to use force to defend themselves.

The State can only enjoy this comfortable and self-serving existence with the support of a compliant judiciary which recognises and abides by it.

The State does not even pretend to be impartial.

The president of France, has just proposed that: “Nationality should be stripped from anyone of foreign origin who deliberately endangers the life of a police officer, a soldier or a gendarme or anyone else holding public authority.”

Obviously it is a far less serious crime if it is simply a common serf who has their life endangered.

The State operates its system of Two Laws because it honestly believes that it is above the laws that apply to serfs.

The system of Two Laws will become more obvious to people as the Global Financial Crisis (which is really a Global Monetary Crisis) becomes worse.

All are equal, but some are more equal than others.

  1. August 29, 2010 at 10:13 pm

    Obviously it is a far less serious crime if it is simply a common serf who has their life endangered.

    It is perhaps perceived as less of a threat to civilized society, since it is the police officer, the soldier, and the gendarme who actively put their lives in harm’s way to protect the innocent and enforce the law.

    Once they are threatened, EVERYONE is threatened…and it becomes every man for himself.

    Then again, that may be what you’re hoping for anyway.

  2. August 30, 2010 at 9:38 am

    I think that your first question answers your second insinuation Natassia. Yes, I do believe that people are basically good. Though it well serves the purpose of The State that the people themselves believe otherwise.
    I am 65 years old and many years have taught me that the vast majority of people are good and decent. Though there would continue to be a level of criminality in a free world, it could not become institutionalized as inevitably happens with all States.
    ‘Every man for himself’ implies that a state of savagery would exist without The State to fend off the barbarous hordes. It is such an assumption that maintains the status quo.
    Regards, Tom

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: